Ten years of roll calls, statements, and public documents — laid out in order, with his stated defense included on every page, so you can check every line yourself.
Read the record →What he did when it counted
The Epstein timeline. Two votes on medals for the Capitol's defenders. Dates, tallies, and his own words.
The state he wants to run
Veterans' healthcare. Seniors' insulin. Nursing homes. Water. Each vote confirmed by name on the Clerk's page.
A decade of output
521 bills in one day, none advanced. The scholars who score Congress wrote him a footnote. The chart speaks.
The numbers, as of August 11, 2026
AUG 2026
AUG 11
Featured exhibit
The Epstein Timeline
“Where is Epstein's client list?”— Rep. Andy Biggs, December 2024
This page is a timeline. Every entry is a public statement, a recorded vote, or a contemporaneous report, linked at the end of each row. Rep. Biggs' stated positions are quoted throughout, including his defense of each decision.
The timeline
His position, in full
Rep. Biggs' office has stated that he voted for H.R. 4405, and that the Oversight Committee had already released more than 60,000 pages of Epstein-related documents through its own process — his stated preference for handling the matter through, in his framing, proper channels.
That position is presented here in full because it is checkable against the timeline above: the committee-process preference is the same process in which he cast one of two votes against release in July, four months before voting yes on the floor.
What this page does not claim
This page makes no claim about Rep. Biggs' motives, beliefs, or private conduct. It documents five dated decisions — a demand, two votes against release, a declined petition, and a vote for release cast two days after the President's reversal, in a tally of 427 to 1 — and places them in order. The order is the record.
Share the exhibit
“To serve with integrity means... you say what you're going to do and you do it.”
— Andy Biggs, “Integrity” campaign ad, 2026. The reader is invited to apply the candidate's standard to the candidate's timeline.The Ethics Platform, Held Against the Record
“To serve with integrity means... you say what you're going to do and you do it. That's keeping faith with the people that elected you.”— Andy Biggs, “Integrity” campaign ad, 2026
On June 1, 2026, the campaign released its Ethics and Transparency Platform — its only detailed policy document. Five commitments. This page lists each as written, the context around it, and the author's own documented record on transparency.
The five commitments
What the platform does not address
Dark money disclosure. Arizona voters approved Prop 211 with 72% of the vote; the state Supreme Court upheld it in June 2026; Republican legislative leaders are suing to overturn it. The platform takes no position, and the candidate has not stated one. The question is open.
Lobbyist gifts and personal disclosure. No proposals beyond existing law. An independent ethics agency. Arizona has none. The platform does not propose one.
The author's record on transparency
Share the exhibit
Every commitment above is specific enough to audit. If Andy Biggs is elected governor, this page will be updated with the outcome of each one: kept, broken, or pending, with dates. That is the standard his own ad proposes, and this site agrees with it.
Veterans: The Votes and the Bills
“Veterans deserve more than speeches and ceremonies—they deserve action.”— Rep. Andy Biggs, Veterans Day statement, November 11, 2025 · Daily Signal
Arizona is home to roughly half a million veterans. This page documents Rep. Biggs' recorded votes on the major veterans' legislation of his tenure, the veterans' bills he sponsored, and his stated reasons.
The first PACT Act vote
| Party | Yeas | Nays |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 222 | 0 |
| Republican | 34 | 174 |
| Biggs (AZ) | — | NAY |
On this vote, his position was his party’s position: House Republicans opposed the bill 174 to 34. What follows is what changed.
The final PACT Act vote
| Party | Yeas | Nays |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 219 | 0 |
| Republican | 123 | 88 |
| Biggs (AZ) | — | NAY |
This was the second PACT Act vote. In March 2022, House Republicans opposed the bill 174 to 34, and Rep. Biggs voted no with the large majority of his party (Roll Call 57). By July, after the Senate returned it, House Republicans split 123 yes to 88 no — a majority of his own party had moved to yes. Rep. Biggs had not. The Clerk lists S. 3373 under its original shell title, “Protecting Our Gold Star Families Education Act” — standard Senate-vehicle procedure. The bill became Public Law 117-168 on August 10, 2022.
The bills he sponsored
Rep. Biggs is the lead sponsor of the TEAM Veteran Caregivers Act, which would require the VA to formally recognize veterans' caregivers, explain clinical determinations that downgrade or terminate caregiver benefits, and extend those benefits 90 days when a veteran is ruled ineligible. He introduced it with a bipartisan group in 2020 and has reintroduced it in every Congress since. It is endorsed by Disabled American Veterans, the Elizabeth Dole Foundation, and Paralyzed Veterans of America, which credited his leadership on due-process protections for significantly disabled veterans. He also sponsors the TBI and PTSD Treatment Act. H.R. 109 (119th) · his announcement
None of these bills has been enacted. That is a fact about outcomes, not about effort — most bills introduced in Congress are never enacted.
His stated reason
This site could not locate a public statement from Rep. Biggs explaining either PACT Act vote. If one exists, send it and it will be published here in full: corrections@biggsrecord.com.
The objection raised by other Republicans who voted no is on the record and is presented here in fairness, though it is theirs rather than his: that the bill moved roughly $400 billion of existing veterans' spending from the discretionary category to the mandatory category, which they argued would permit unrelated future spending. Sen. Pat Toomey, who led that argument, said his concern had nothing to do with the purpose of the bill. Readers may weigh it alongside two facts: a majority of House Republicans voted for the bill anyway in July, and it was signed into law within a month. Toomey statement
What this page does not claim
This page makes no claim about Rep. Biggs' regard for veterans, his motives, or his character. It documents recorded votes, sponsored bills, and stated reasoning, in order, with sources. The record is the record.
Share the exhibit
“To serve with integrity means... you say what you're going to do and you do it.”
— Andy Biggs, “Integrity” campaign ad, 2026“Protector”
“We will fully fund our public safety departments.”— biggsforarizona.com, campaign platform · “Protector” — title of a Biggs for Arizona campaign ad, July 2026
This page documents Rep. Biggs' two recorded votes on the Congressional Gold Medals awarded to the police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, his stated reasons, and one related current matter — which is a contested characterization, and is labeled as one.
The first vote
| Party | Yeas | Nays |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 219 | 0 |
| Republican | 194 | 12 |
| Biggs (AZ) | — | NAY — one of 12 in the House |
The second vote
| Party | Yeas | Nays |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 218 | 0 |
| Republican | 188 | 21 |
| Biggs (AZ) | — | NAY — one of 21 |
On August 3, 2021, the Senate passed the bill by unanimous consent — no senator of either party objected. It became Public Law 117-32 two days later. The medals honor, among others, Officers Brian Sicknick and Howard Liebengood of the Capitol Police and Officer Jeffrey Smith of the Metropolitan Police Department.
His stated reason
Asked by CNN's Manu Raju to explain the June vote, Rep. Biggs declined to answer. The following day, he posted a video saying he wanted the legislation to be a “non-political” appreciation of police officers. That reason is presented here in full. Readers weighing it may note that it was offered after the second no vote, and that the objection did not prevent 188 of his fellow House Republicans, and every senator of both parties, from supporting the honor.
A current matter, graded honestly
In June 2026, Rep. Biggs intervened in state ballot negotiations with a proposal — publicly adopted by legislative leaders as “the Biggs plan” — that preserved most of a Republican ballot referral package. Critics warn that language in one preserved measure could impair collective bargaining not only for teachers but for police officers and firefighters. AZ Mirror · Capitol Media Services · ABC15 · measure context
That claim is a characterization of untested ballot language, not a settled fact, and this page does not present it as one. Supporters state the measure's purpose is directed at the teachers' union. The measure's text is linked; readers can judge its scope themselves. It appears here for one reason: if the broad reading is correct, the candidate whose platform promises to fully fund public safety preserved a measure that would restrict public-safety workers' bargaining rights. If the narrow reading is correct, it would not. November puts the question to voters either way.
What this page does not claim
This page makes no claim about Rep. Biggs' regard for law enforcement, his motives, or his character. It documents two recorded votes, a stated reason, and one contested current question — labeled as such — with sources. The record is the record.
Share the exhibit
“To serve with integrity means... you say what you're going to do and you do it.”
— Andy Biggs, “Integrity” campaign ad, 2026Colorado City
“I don’t think in Arizona we should have police departments that have 50 percent of their officers decertified.”— Rep. Michelle Ugenti (R), sponsor of HB 2648, 2013
This page documents one bill from Mr. Biggs’ time as president of the Arizona Senate: what it did, how the House voted, what happened to it in his chamber, and his campaign’s stated defense. It concerns the Colorado City Marshal’s Office — the local police force serving the twin polygamous towns of Colorado City, Arizona and Hildale, Utah, home of the FLDS sect whose leader, Warren Jeffs, was convicted in 2011 of sexually assaulting children he called brides.
The bill
House Bill 2648 (2013) would have allowed the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board to decertify a law-enforcement agency itself — not just its individual officers — and place policing under a county-appointed administrator. It was written for one situation: a marshal’s office repeatedly accused of serving the sect rather than the public, including officers decertified for offenses connected to the church. The Arizona House passed it 52–7, with both parties’ support. Phoenix New Times, 2013 · House committee minutes
What happened in the Senate
Senate President Andy Biggs assigned the bill to two committees — Public Safety, and Government and Environment. Neither ever scheduled it for a hearing. The session ended; the bill died without a vote. Phoenix New Times, 2013
In July 2026, the Washington Post examined the episode. The bill’s sponsor — a Republican — attributes the bill’s death to Mr. Biggs. The Washington Post, July 20, 2026
His stated defense
A Biggs campaign adviser told the Post the congressman addressed flaws in what was “poorly-written legislation” that state police organizations opposed, and cited his record supporting child-safety funding and anti-exploitation measures. That defense is presented here as given.
What happened after
The reform the bill proposed was ultimately imposed from outside Arizona’s legislature: a federal jury found in 2016 that the towns had violated residents’ civil rights, and in 2017 a federal judge ordered years of court supervision over the marshal’s office. What the Arizona House voted to do in 2013, a federal courtroom did four years later. The Washington Post, July 20, 2026
What this page does not claim
This page makes no claim about why the bill was not heard, and none about Mr. Biggs’ regard for the children of Colorado City. Committee assignment records, a 52–7 House roll call, a sponsor’s on-the-record attribution, a stated defense, and a federal docket. The record is the record.
“To serve with integrity means... you say what you’re going to do and you do it.”
— Andy Biggs, “Integrity” campaign ad, 2026A Decade of Output
On a single Wednesday, Rep. Biggs introduced 521 bills — H.R. 1844 through H.R. 2364 — more bills in one day than most members sponsor in a career. Each was one sentence: a funding limitation on a single discretionary spending item. The Congressional Record for that day prints them all, for six pages. Roll Call covered it; the Record itself is linked. Below is the full list — every bill number links to its page on congress.gov. Pick any one at random; they all end the same way: Introduced.
The scorekeepers' footnote
The Center for Effective Lawmaking — the academic project that has scored every member of Congress since 1973 — found the filing so anomalous that its report on the 118th Congress created a methodological exception to keep it from distorting the data. His office's stated purpose, in full: the bills would collectively return nondefense discretionary spending to pre-COVID levels. None progressed. CEL · Roll Call
Fairness in both directions
Rep. Biggs has missed 2.0% of roll call votes in his career — in line with the House median of 2.1%. His attendance is normal, and no claim to the contrary should be made. Heritage Action, the conservative movement's scorecard, rates him 98% this session and 94% lifetime. By movement scorecard, he is elite; by legislative output, he is a footnote. The two measurements are different instruments, and this page presents both. GovTrack · Heritage Action
What this page does not claim
This page makes no claim about Rep. Biggs' work ethic or sincerity. It documents counts, outcomes, and the published assessments of nonpartisan and conservative scorekeepers, with his office's stated purpose included. The record is the record.
Share the exhibit
“To serve with integrity means... you say what you're going to do and you do it.”
— Andy Biggs, “Integrity” campaign ad, 2026His Own Gameplan
“To serve with integrity means... you say what you’re going to do and you do it.”— Andy Biggs, “Integrity” campaign ad, 2026
The Biggs for Arizona platform contains six planks, each roughly forty words. This page quotes the commitment of each and places the documented record beside it. His campaign’s framing — that planks are priorities, with details to come in governing — is noted here once, at the top, and applies to every row.
Plank 1 · “Make Arizona Affordable”
Plank 2 · “Keep Arizona Safe”
Plank 3 · “Secure Arizona’s Energy Future”
Plank 4 · “Restore Sensible Water Policy”
Plank 5 · “Protect School and Health Choice”
Plank 6 · “Ensure Election Integrity”
A note on the platform itself
Six planks, roughly forty words each, no cost estimates, no implementing detail, and one supplementary document — an ethics platform, crosswalked on its own page. The office being sought administers a $65 billion enterprise. This observation is a count, not a characterization.
Share the exhibit
The epigraph at the top of this page is the standard at the bottom of it. The candidate proposed it. This site applies it.
Elections: The Record and the Office
“Andy will work to restore faith in our elections...”— biggsforarizona.com, campaign platform, 2026
Two facts about the office, stated precisely. Under A.R.S. § 16-648, the Secretary of State canvasses Arizona’s general election results on the fourth Monday after the election, at a public meeting, in the presence of the Governor and the Attorney General. The Governor does not conduct that canvass. Separately, the Governor signs the certificate of ascertainment naming Arizona’s presidential electors — in 2020, Governor Ducey signed it alongside Secretary Hobbs on November 30. That signature is a governor’s act, and it is the reason this page exists. Since 2022, federal law has made that duty explicit: the Electoral Count Reform Act identifies each state’s governor — unless state law provides otherwise — as the official responsible for issuing the certificate of ascertainment, and directs Congress to treat that certificate as conclusive unless a court orders otherwise. The law also builds in guardrails: the certificate must follow state law as it existed before election day, and federal courts can compel or correct it on an expedited basis. Senate summary · statutory text This page documents Rep. Biggs’ recorded actions concerning the 2020 presidential election, in order, and his stated position today. Because of the stakes, it holds itself to the strictest version of this site’s rules: recorded votes, court filings, and transcribed statements only.
The record
His position, in full
Rep. Biggs has maintained that his objections concerned election procedures and constitutional questions about how certain states administered the 2020 vote, and that his focus is on future elections rather than past ones. That position is presented here in his framing, beside a timeline that runs from December 2020 to the present.
Why it appears on this site
Stated plainly: the office he seeks holds a formal role in certifying Arizona’s elections, including 2028. The record above is the available evidence of how this candidate approaches election results he disputes. No prediction is made here. The reader is invited to make their own.
What this page does not claim
This page makes no claim about Rep. Biggs’ beliefs, motives, or intentions in any future election. It documents five dated actions and one current stated position. The record is the record.
Share the exhibit
“To serve with integrity means... you say what you’re going to do and you do it.”
— Andy Biggs, “Integrity” campaign ad, 2026Open Questions
This page asks. It does not assert. Each question below concerns a decision the next governor will face, on which the candidate has not stated a public position as of the date shown. If he answers any of them, this page will be updated with his answer, dated and quoted, whatever it is. That is the only promise this page makes.
AUG 2026
AUG 2026
AUG 2026
AUG 2026
Silence is not an accusation. It is a fact with a date on it.
What this site won’t say
Accountability sites are usually judged by what they publish. This one asks to be judged partly by what it didn’t. Below are the categories of material about Rep. Biggs that reached this desk and were rejected, and why. This page exists so that readers can calibrate everything else here.
If something here is wrong, the correction gets published, dated, at the top of the page it corrects. Write: corrections@biggsrecord.com.
Media Kit
Eight exhibit cards, sized for any feed. Every card carries its own source citation printed on the image, so it still works after it has been screenshotted, cropped, and reshared by someone who never saw this site. That is the point. Take them. No attribution required, no permission needed.
Download all eight cards (ZIP)
Individual cards
Ground rules
Don’t alter the numbers. Don’t remove the citation line. If a card is wrong, say so and it will be corrected and reissued: corrections@biggsrecord.com. Editable SVG masters are included in the ZIP for anyone who wants other sizes.
How this site works
Every page on this site follows the same rules, without exception:
Who runs this site
This site is written and paid for by one Arizona voter. Not a campaign, not a committee, not a party, not a PAC. No one is paid to write it, and it accepts no money — no donations, no ads, no sponsorships. Total cost to date: the price of a domain name.
It is unsigned for the ordinary reason: the author would rather not invite mail at his home. That is a personal choice, and it comes with a fair objection — that an anonymous site can say anything. So this site is built to make the objection irrelevant. Nothing here rests on the author’s word. Every vote links to the Clerk of the House. Every bill links to congress.gov. Every quote is dated and sourced to the place it was said. Read none of the prose and click all of the links, and the page still works. That is the design.
The test for anything published here is not “it is true because we said it.” It is: check it yourself. Corrections that survive that test are published, dated, at the top of the page they correct. Write: corrections@biggsrecord.com. Documents, tips, and anything else: tips@biggsrecord.com.